The media twist and outright gaslighting to cover up the reality of teaching critical race theory in our schools and institutions have shifted into high gear.
First of all, we were told that this does not happen at all.
Then we were informed that trying to stop him was authoritarian fascism or something.
Now the media and left-wing politicians have flocked to a new narrative that Critical Race Theory is just about teaching an accurate history and that naysayers just don’t want students to know about racism and the slavery.
“Let’s be clear: Critical Race Theory is not taught in elementary or secondary schools,” said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, the nation’s second largest public school teachers union.
She said Republicans and state legislatures that pass anti-critical racial theory bills “are just trying to stop us from teaching kids an honest story.”
Ibram X.Kendi, author of How To Be An Anti-Racist, responded on Twitter.
When White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki was asked about ‘anti-racist’ study programs in classrooms by RealClearPolitics White House reporter Philip Wegmann, she took a similar line. .
“The president believes that in our history there are many dark moments. And it’s not just slavery and racism in our history, there is systemic racism that still has an impact on society today, ”Psaki said.
She then spoke about First Lady Jill Biden’s teaching background.
“As the wife of an educator and as someone who continues to believe that children should learn not only the good, but the challenge of our history as well, and that is part of what we are talking about here, although it’s getting politically charged, “she said.
It’s a dodge.
What is this “honest” story that they are trying to promote in the classroom?
The National Education Association, the nation’s largest public school teachers’ union, said in a recent directive that it aims to promote “a comprehensive study already created that criticizes empire, white supremacy, anti- Black, anti-indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, ableism, anthropocentrism and other forms of power and oppression at the intersections of our society, and that we oppose attempts to ban critical race theory and or [The New York Times’] Project 1619.
Does this sound like just ancient history to you?
Parents who protest Critical Race Theory are not calling for slavery education removed from classrooms.
None of the anti-critical racial theory bills passed in a number of states to date have prohibited teaching of racism in America’s past.
Kimberle Crenshaw, one of the founders of Critical Race Theory, wrote in an Outlook column for the Washington Post that the fact that the bills do not mention specific events or slavery is what makes them stand out. makes it “insidious”.
She then completely avoided mentioning the key concepts that make Critical Race Theory so unacceptable to many Americans. Ideas like systemic racism, white privilege, superstructures, or any of the other critical concepts in racial theory don’t really come across in his article.
Here are some of its themes as defined by Jonathan Butcher and Mike Gonzalez of The Heritage Foundation:
-The Marxist analysis of society made up of categories of oppressors and oppressed;
-An unhealthy dose of Nietzschean relativism, which means that language does not agree with an objective reality, but is the simple instrument of the dynamics of power;
– The idea that the oppressed hinder the revolution when they adhere to the cultural beliefs of their oppressors and must be subjected to re-education sessions;
-The concomitant need to dismantle all societal norms by relentless criticism; and
-The replacement of all systems of power and even the descriptions of these systems by a worldview that describes only the oppressors and the oppressed.
Nicole Neily, president of Parents Defending Education, said it’s totally inaccurate to interpret bills that remove critical race theory from classrooms so as not to teach slavery or racism.
“No one disputes ‘teaching history’ or ‘teaching slavery’, and accusing parents of doing so is not only lazy, it is also a straw man,” said Neily, according to the Washington Times.
It is a dodge to cover up the radical ideological teaching imposed on children in the classroom.
Parents are simply trying to stop elementary schools from turning into what Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley has called “social justice boot camps.”
Given the kind of historic education that leftist advocacy groups try to force on classrooms, it’s clear that precision is not one of their primary goals.
Consider this: if teaching Critical Race Theory is really about bringing an accurate history into classrooms, why are the nation’s largest public school unions partnering with the New’s deeply flawed 1619 Project? York Times and Project Zinn to do it?
The Zinn Project promotes the work of the late Howard Zinn, the Communist author of “A People’s History of the United States”. His book is riddled with historical inaccuracies, factual distortions, and outright dishonesty.
It’s more of a manipulative political leaflet than a history book.
Mary Grabar, author of “Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing the Fake History That Turned a Generation against America,” wrote about how Zinn used a series of often contested and out of context stories to paint a picture of America – and his view of “capitalism” – as inherently bad and rotten from its inception.
“The stories he put in ‘A Popular History of the United States’ were not a balanced factual story, but crude moral narratives designed to destroy the patriotism of Americans and turn them into radical leftists,” Grabar wrote. .
These ideas have been circulating in American education for some time, but recent developments have overwhelmed them in our classrooms.
Project 1619, which was created to “reframe” American history around the idea that slavery, not freedom, is central to our country’s ethics is also filled with inaccuracies. One of the most important is that the Founding Fathers started the American Revolution to protect slavery, which is a ridiculous claim.
The creator of Project 1619, Nikole Hannah-Jones, even admitted that her work isn’t really about teaching history.
Rather, Hannah-Jones and people like her want to rewrite history to achieve their current ideological goals.
The problem is that these powerful institutions that attempt to impose critical theory of race, “anti-racism” and revolution on the American people have run into parents who oppose the political project of supporters of critical theory of race. race and who do not understand that their children are taught that some are inherently oppressive or oppressed because of their race.
Whether they like it or not, the awakened managerial revolution has clashed with democracy.
Do you have an opinion on this article ? To ring, please send an email [email protected] and we will consider posting your amended remarks in our regular “We Hear You” section. Be sure to include the URL or title of the article as well as your name and city and / or state.